Please answer three of the four essay questions (choose 3) in times new roman 12
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
Please answer three of the four essay questions (choose 3) in times new roman 12.
Please answer each question separately, with a combined reference list at the end.
When writing the essay, you should be guided by the following criteria:
• Clarity. essay should contain easily discernible answers and arguments.
• Independence. Students should strive to engage in independent, analytical discussions.
• Theory. Answers should be guided by theories and concepts presented in the course
literature. The text should contain explicit references to the course literature.
• Empirics. The arguments should be illustrated by a convincing use of relevant empirical
facts, even if there is no requirement that students should gather empirical material.
• Readability and presentation. The text should be well-written and easy to follow.
References and quotations should be properly presented.
Essay questions (CHOOSE 3)
1. Discuss whether realism, institutionalism, or constructivism offers the most credible
account of international cooperation. Make your argument drawing on themes and
empirical examples from the course.
2. Discuss whether international organizations suffer from a democratic deficit, and if so,
how this deficit may be reduced. Relate to competing positions in the course literature
and exemplify using IOs of your choice.
3. Discuss how international organizations may work to ensure that states comply with
agreed rules and what factors shape whether these strategies are effective. Illustrate
your argument with reference to two IOs of your choice.
4. Discuss why and how newer modes of global governance are becoming more
prominent, next to traditional international organizations. Illustrate your argument
using a concrete example of a new governance institution
SOURCES:
Book (MAIN SOURCE TO BE USED)
Rittberger, Volker, Bernhard Zangl, Andreas Kruck, and Hylke Dijkstra. 2019. International Organization. 3RD EDITION. Macmillan International Higher Education.
(Let me know if you dont have access to this book and I can possibly upload pictures)
Articles (ATTACHED)
Alter, Karen J., and Sophie Meunier. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 13-24.
Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 1999. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53(4): 699-732.
Barnett, Michael N., Jon C.W. Pevehouse, and Kal Raustiala. 2022. Introduction: The Modes of Global Governance. In Michael N.
Barnett, Jon C.W. Pevehouse, and Kal Raustiala (eds.) Global Governance in a World of Change, 1-47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bäckstrand, Karin. 2011. The Democratic Legitimacy of Global Governance after Copenhagen. In John S. Dryzek, Richard B. Norgaard, and David Schlosberg (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, 669-684. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1999. Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View. In Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordón (eds.) Democracy’s Edges, 19-36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dellmuth, Lisa, Jan Aart Scholte, Jonas Tallberg, and Soetkin Verhaegen. The Elite-Citizen Gap in International Organization Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 116(1): 283-300.
Gutner, Tamar, and Alexander Thompson. 2010. The Politics of IO Performance: A Framework. Review of International Organizations 5(3): 227-248.
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2015. Delegation and Pooling in International Organizations. Review of International Organizations 10(3): 305-328.
Koliev, Faradj, Thomas Sommerer, and Jonas Tallberg. 2020. Compliance without Coercion: Effects of Reporting on International Labor Rights. Journal of Peace Research Online First.
Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55(4): 761-799.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473-524.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2004. Is there a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis. Government and Opposition 39(2): 336-363.
Raustiala, Kal. 1997. States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions. International Studies Quarterly 41(4): 719-740.
Tallberg, Jonas. 2010. Transnational Access to International Institutions: Three Approaches. In Christer Jönsson and Jonas Tallberg (eds.) Transnational Actors in Global Governance: Patterns, Explanations, and Implications. Houndsmills & New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 45-66.
Tallberg, Jonas and Michael Zürn. 2019. The Legitimacy and Legitimation of International Organizations: Introduction and Framework. Review of International Organizations 14: 581-606.
Tallberg, Jonas, Thomas Sommerer, Theresa Squatrito, and Christer Jönsson. 2014. Explaining the Transnational Design of International Organizations. International Organization 68(4): 741-774.
Vabulas, Felicity, and Duncan Snidal. 2013. Organization without Delegation: Informal Intergovernmental Organizations (IIGOs) and the Spectrum of Intergovernmental Arrangements. Review of International Organizations 8(2): 193-220.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates