Submitting Responses to Media Analysis, Critical Thinking, and Fallacies: A Comprehensive Approach
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS:
In a Word document or PDF submit your response to Part A, Part B, and Part C found below.
Part A – Media Analysis:
Find and describe a recent (less than 3 months old) news story and apply the “10 Questions For Fake News Detection” to it. Conclude with a statement about whether or not the news story is fake.
Part B – 7 Habits of a Critical Thinker:
Think of and describe an original example where you can incorporate all seven habits of a critical thinker. In your own words define the seven habits of a critical thinker and describe how they would be utilized in your original example.
Part C – Fallacies:
What are the top three fallacious arguments that resonate with you? Why? Include an original definition/description of all three of the fallacies.
HOW TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT (EXAMPLE ESSAY / DRAFT)
To avoid falling victim to fake news in the age of information overload, it’s necessary to critically evaluate the news items and information we come across. This essay will discuss Parts A, B, and C, which are separately devoted to Media Analysis, the Seven Habits of a Critical Thinker, and Fallacies.
Media analysis, part A:
The COVID-19 vaccination launch in the US is a recent news item that has garnered headlines. Let’s examine the news report using the “10 Questions for Fake News Detection” offered by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA):
What is the news’s source?
The mainstream media, which includes CNN, Fox News, and other significant news organizations, is the source of this news item.
Is the story up to date?
The story, which discusses the current COVID-19 vaccination introduction in the United States, is, in fact, timely.
What proof is there?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other health organizations’ statistics, along with expert interviews, provide the basis of the evidence.
The story has been covered elsewhere?
Yes, numerous news organizations both domestically and abroad have covered the story.
What’s the author’s motivation?
The author’s goal is to update readers on the most recent developments and to enlighten the public about the launch of the COVID-19 vaccine in the US as it stands right now.
Is the data offered factual or subjective?
Experts offer their ideas and observations on the subject, and the information provided is a combination of fact and opinion.
Is the information exaggerated in any way?
The majority of the reporting on the COVID-19 vaccination deployment has been factual and unbiased, notwithstanding some spectacular headlines and reporting.
What is the story’s tone?
With some stories indicating difficulties and problems with the vaccine deployment, the story’s tone is generally impartial and educational.
Exist any fallacies in logic?
No logical fallacies seem to have been used in the reporting of the COVID-19 vaccination distribution.
How intuitive are you personally?
The evidence offered suggests that the news report is authentic and not a fabrication.
Using the “10 Questions for Fake News Detection,” it can be concluded that the news report about the COVID-19 vaccination launch in the US is accurate.
7 Habits of a Critical Thinker, Part B:
The following are the Seven Habits of a Critical Thinker:
Be enquiring and flexible.
Contest presumptions.
Form knowledgeable opinions.
Analyze data with objectivity.
Take into account different viewpoints.
Pose inquiries.
Effective communication.
Choosing which institution or university to attend is a unique instance where all seven habits could be applied. Assume that there are two institutions to choose from. A critical thinker in this situation would take the following actions:
Be inquisitive and open-minded: The person would look into both universities with an open mind to learn as much as they could about each school.
Dispute presumptions: The person would dispute any assumptions or biases they may have regarding the schools.
Form educated opinions: After gathering all the necessary data, the person would form informed judgments on each institution.
Analyze information impartially: The person would conduct an impartial analysis of the information they have gathered.
Consider alternate viewpoints: The person would take into account alternative viewpoints, such as consulting friends or relatives who have attended the schools for guidance.
Ask questions: To learn more about the colleges, the person would interview admissions officers and current students.
Effective communication: The person would explain their choice.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates