Funding Students, Not Systems: Exploring the Potential Outcomes of the SCHOOL Act
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS:
part one
The SCHOOL Act
Introduction
As we have learned in this unit, education is an important factor in determining occupation and income, as well as health. The COVID-19 pandemic has created major setbacks in education, leading to questions regarding the K-12 system. One idea that has gained traction as a result is “funding students, not systems”.
Your Tasks
Task 1- Read/Research
Please take a few moments to review the SCHOOL ActLinks to an external site., which was introduced in August 2020. You can also conduct your search for article commentaries regarding the Act.
Task 2- Original Post
Next, you will need to create your discussion post. Your post must address the following (point values indicated in bold):
What are positive and/or negative outcomes that could result if the SCHOOL Act is passed? (5 points)
Given your research into this topic, do you support the Act or not? Explain. (5 points)
What are other means by which we can lessen educational inequalities? (6 points)
The post must be a minimum of 250 words. (2 points)
Include at least 1 outside reference, cited in APA format. This reference needs to be cited both in-text and at the end of the post in a reference list. (2 points)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.part two
Vaping
Vaping. How safe is it? Do you understand the difference between smoking and vaping? Now that you know about brain development, what about young people vaping?
First, watch this video that compares smoking and vaping. Links to an external site. You learn here, that it IS safer….. for lung tar. Does that mean it is safe?
What else is going into the user’s lungs? Here is a piece from (https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org)
The Chemicals You Inhale When Vaping
Instead of bathing lung tissue with a therapeutic mist, just as a nebulizer does, vaping coats lungs with potentially harmful chemicals. E-liquid concoctions usually include some mix of flavorings, aromatic additives, and nicotine or THC (the chemical in marijuana that causes psychological effects), dissolved in an oily liquid base. “We think that some of the vaporized elements of the oil are getting deep down into the lungs and causing an inflammatory response,” explains Broderick.
The substance at the center of the investigation is vitamin E. It’s often used as a thickening and delivery agent in e-liquid. And, while it’s safe when taken orally as a supplement or used on the skin, it’s likely an irritant when inhaled. It’s been found in the lungs of people with severe, vaping-related damage.
Other common substances found in e-liquid or produced when it’s heated up may also pose a risk to the lungs. These include:
Diacetyl: This food additive, used to deepen e-cigarette flavors, is known to damage small passageways in the lungs.
Formaldehyde: This toxic chemical can cause lung disease and contribute to heart disease.
Acrolein: Most often used as a weed killer, this chemical can also damage the lungs.
WOW! Safer? Users may not be putting tar into their lungs but they are putting foreign substances into their lungs. Seems like it would be like saying “Eating fire is bad so eat staples instead!” BOTH are a bad idea!!!
Here is another video showing how a young woman was lucky to get treatment in time. Lung illness and vaping.Links to an external site.
We also learned about habits and addiction. There is no smoke, but there is nicotine. Smoke or chemicals are what hurts your lungs, but it is the nicotine that changes your brain chemistry. You hear it from the last user, she was addicted to nicotine, which is more concentrated in a vape than in cigarettes, and users are addicted to habits.
We also learned about how the big tobacco and alcohol industries marketed to weak or isolated markets.
Combine addiction and marketing and see how vaping impacts our young adultsLinks on an external site.
The initial marketing for vapes was “for quitting smoking”. Does that seem like what is happening? Is it possible these companies are just finding new users for products? These teens certainly sound addicted.
For this assignment:
1. Find an ad (web or social media) or package of a vape or flavor that looks like it is marketed to teens. Take a photo or screenshot and post it. You cannot post the same as another post.
2. Tell us if you thought vaping was “better” than smoking before watching these. What do you think now?
3. What % of the people that you are close to smoke or vape? Do you think it is a substance abuse or public health problem?
4. Provide a comment on the impact of marketing vape products-either personally, or from what you see in peers or the family. Should advertising be allowed? Do the ads look focused on adults quitting smoking (the vape industries claim vapes are good for adult users that are hooked on cigarettes already) or more directed to new users (young people)?
Should vape use be more regulated? Don’t forget many people make money selling these products. How do you think regulation should look? You can have different ideas for teens/vs adults.
Think twice before you pick up the “safer” vape!!!
HOW TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT (EXAMPLE ESSAY / DRAFT)
Introduction: A person’s future is greatly influenced by their education. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought attention to the shortcomings of the K–12 educational system and prompted ideas about improvements. The SCHOOL Act, which was launched in August 2020, is one such change that is gaining traction. Instead of supporting educational systems, this measure suggests funding students.
Read/Research Task 1
The SCHOOL Act intends to give federal education money to families directly, enabling them to choose from a variety of educational options, such as online courses or tutoring, public, private, or charter schools. Mixed responses have been given to this proposal. Advocates claim that the law would improve access to education, give parents more control over what kind of education their kids receive, and promote competition and innovation among institutions. Nevertheless, detractors contend that the law would undermine public education, increase educational disparities, and benefit affluent families who can afford to augment federal funding with private monies.
Secondly, the original Post
Possible implications of the SCHOOL Act, both favorable and unfavorable:
The SCHOOL Act may have beneficial effects on education, including expanding parental control over their children’s education and fostering competition and innovation among schools. But the unfavorable effects can include undermining public education, escalating educational disparities, and favoring affluent families who can augment the federal cash with other resources.
Do I support the Act now that I have done my homework on the subject?
The SCHOOL Act has the potential to weaken public education and worsen educational inequality, hence I do not support it. Because wealthy families can supplement federal funding with private resources, the legislation benefits them and results in an unequal distribution of educational possibilities. Instead, we must put more effort into bolstering public education and giving schools enough funding to ensure that all pupils have access to high-quality education.
Other strategies for reducing educational disparities include tackling the underlying causes of poverty, such as unemployment and limited access to healthcare. Reducing educational disparities can also be accomplished by ensuring that all children have access to high-quality early childhood education. Additionally, we can raise public school financing, give schools appropriate resources, and guarantee that all students, regardless of socioeconomic level, have access to high-quality education.
Suffice it to say that while the SCHOOL Act has received mixed reviews, it has the potential to weaken public education and worsen educational disparities. To eliminate educational disparities, we must prioritize enhancing public education and tackling the underlying causes of poverty.
Congress of the United States. (2020, August 04). H.R. 8114, the COVID-19 Supporting Children with Disabilities Act. House Bill 8114 was retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates