Peer Review Assignments: Complete 2 out of 3
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS:
You will be automatically assigned 3 peer reviews to complete, but you are only required to review 2 of the 3 assigned to you. Simply type “Pass” for the review you elect not to do a review on.
-Each reply (that you want me to grade) must be at least 1 paragraph and 75 words in overall length
— You’re certainly welcome to engage in the discussion as much as you’d like without regard to length/reference restrictions beyond your initial reply
– Each post must address the original post and can either agree or disagree with the original poster’s positions. As with the original post – support your arguments. You should address all 3 questions in your reply and support your positions with at least 2 external sources (Internet sources preferred)
– BE CIVIL! This is a debate on competing positions for a contemporary issue. There is no right or wrong answer and everyone’s opinion is valid. It’s not personal, and you should definitely avoid any comment that might be construed as a personal attack. However, you must articulate a definitive stance on your agreement/disagreement with the original poster as part of your post.
Responses provided after acceptance
HOW TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT (EXAMPLE ESSAY / DRAFT)
According to the guidelines for peer review assignments, each reviewer will automatically be given three peers to evaluate, although they only need to complete two of the three reviews. Although it can seem like a little point, it actually has a significant bearing on the caliber of the reviews and the fairness of the procedure.
First off, enabling reviewers to forgo one of their required reviews makes it more likely that they will devote more time to the other two. As a result, the authors may receive more considerate and complete comments, which will ultimately be more beneficial to their learning and writing development.
It’s crucial to take into account any potential drawbacks of this strategy as well. For instance, it might be unjust for that author to receive less input than their colleagues if all reviewers choose to skip the same person’s evaluation. Additionally, reviewers may favor particular themes or writing styles if they simply select to evaluate the papers that they find the easiest or most engaging.
It could be useful to put in place a system where reviewers are assigned to their peers at random and are obligated to finish all assigned reviews in order to address these problems. By doing so, bias and unfairness in the process would be avoided and every author would receive an equal quantity of input.
Sources:
The Balance Careers, Rachel Jagareski, “The Importance of Peer Review”
Why is Peer Review Important? by Wiley Online Library and Wiley Exchanges.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates