2. The choices in existing law (pp.14-29) for offenses against cybersecurity. If the offending act is misuse of a computer to (1) gain unauthorized access to data (an offense against confidentiality), or (2) change or delete data (an offense against integrity), or (3) deny access (an offense against availability)… · Why is the existing…
Read more
By the due date assigned, submit your answers to this Discussion Area. Post the assignment directly in the discussion thread and label the answers with the appropriate scenario number. Do not copy the scenarios into the thread with the answers. Start reviewing and responding to your classmates as early in the week as possible.…
Read more
In Chapter 27, read Case 27-2, Kane vs. Kroll and discuss the following: What evidence is there that Kane was a holder in due course? How do rules of law play into the court’s reasoning? Are there ambiguities present in these rules of law? What ethical value guided this conclusion? In Chapter 12, read…
Read more
in 200-300 words awnser the question below with references: What are the variables included in calculating economic and cultural impact to the host city/country? Describe the key factors that would contribute to host a successful Women’s World Cup. example would be: Cultural Impact of the Olympic Games The cultural impacts of the Olympic Games are central to cultural…
Read more
Create case briefs for the Duffley and Snow cases. In addition, write a summary comparing and contrasting the Duffley and Snow cases. Short paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Page length requirements: 2-4 pages I have included a sample paper for you…
Read more
View the video resource on bankruptcy basics. Then, read Case Study 2 of the final project and respond to the clients in “memo” format, addressing the listed critical elements.
In Chapter 27, read Case 27-2, Kane vs. Kroll and discuss the following: What evidence is there that Kane was a holder in due course? How do rules of law play into the court’s reasoning? Are there ambiguities present in these rules of law? What ethical value guided this conclusion? In Chapter 12, read…
Read more
awnser 200-300 words the following question ‘ Why did the court in the NCAA v. Tarkanian case decide that the NCAA was not a state actor and do you think that should be the precedent? Why or why not? use references
/* Selecting one of the four topics, you will be required to submit a 300-word minimum main topic posting. Your initial posting should be analytical, persuasive, or reflective in nature. Please add your references to the main topic posting (required). You are encouraged to do research on the topic from other resources. Each classmate’s response…
Read more
Topic 3: Gender Matters in the Insanity Defense Breheney, C., Groscup, J., & Galietta, M. (2007). Gender matters in the insanity defense. Law and Psychology Review, 31, 93–123. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-15282-005